Is there an election agenda for science?
29th October 2001
Today’s Great Science Debate between Minister Nick Minchin and Shadow Science Minister, Martyn Evans, revealed little about either party’s vision for science and technology after 10th November. It did, however, whet the appetite of those present for some alternative strategy accompanied by costed initiatives.
`The current anthrax scare shows the need for a scientifically literate community and more investment in research and development, particularly in areas such as public health’ said NTEU President Dr Carolyn Allport.
`Today’s debate was a disappointment, insofar as the Labor Party was not ready to release funded policies, and Minister Minchin is content to refer to what the Government has done, as opposed to what it will do,’ said Carolyn Allport. `What’s needed are costed policies and an alternative vision.’
`We’re looking forward to seeing what the Labor Party has to offer, as well as whether the government can build on the momentum generated by Backing Australia’s Ability.’
`So far, both parties have agreed to maintain funding allocated under Backing Australia’s Ability. In addition, Labor has promised 1000 HECS-exempt scholarships to attract talented teachers in areas of need, particularly science-related areas. Our top priority now should be re-building the science base in universities and schools.’
`Over the past five years, funding for research and development from public and private sources has fallen. We can’t afford to continue along this route. The Chief Scientist’s Report last year provided us with a road map to the future – now we need a leader to take us there,’ she said.