Back to NTEU National Office
NTEU Intellectual Property FAQ
Posted 19 November 2010 by Jen T. Kwok (NTEU National Office)
Since UWA vs Gray, the certainty some universities assumed about the common law ownership of various kinds of IP produced by university staff and students has been significantly changed.
This represents an issue of immense significance to the nature of employment for university staff all across Australia.
NTEU has prepared an FAQ about the intellectual property rights (IPR) of university staff and students. It can be accessed here. We welcome any posts, comments, further questions and/or feedback.
Tags:
watch, workforce, IP, intellectual property, deed polls
•
Related Blogs:
ACT Division,
NSW Division,
NT Division,
Vic Division,
WA Division,
SA Division,
Qld Division,
Tas Division,
Australian Catholic University,
University of Adelaide,
Australian Defence Force Academy,
Australian National University,
University of Ballarat,
Batchelor Institute of Indigenous Tertiary Education,
Bond University,
University of Canberra,
Charles Darwin University,
Central Queensland University,
Charles Sturt University,
Curtin University of Technology,
Deakin University,
Edith Cowan University,
Flinders University,
Griffith University,
James Cook University,
La Trobe University,
Macquarie University,
University of Melbourne,
Monash University,
Murdoch University,
University of Notre Dame Australia,
University of Newcastle,
University of New South Wales,
Queensland University of Technology,
RMIT University,
Southern Cross University,
Swinburne University of Technology,
University of Sydney,
University of New England,
University of Queensland,
University of South Australia,
University of the Sunshine Coast,
University of Southern Queensland,
University of Technology Sydney,
University of Western Australia,
University of Western Sydney,
University of Wollongong
Comments
[ +2 ] Thanks for the question Byron.
Like • Dislike •Much would turn upon what you meant by 'modified' - whether in another employer-employee context those modifications could be interpreted as the creation of intellectual property.
Instead of speculating on questions of law, the best starting point would be to look at your university's IP policy and identify your university's relevant university contact person. This might be the DVC - Research. It might be a designated Intellectual Property Officer. It may be a commercialisation division or entity within or owned by the university. You could then ask them directly what the university's policy was.
You should be able to expect that they can explain the university's policy in detail. If you were dissatisfied with their answer, you could run further questions by us.
[ +1 ] Thanks for the FAQ. My interest in this topic is how the University would handle "ownership" of open-source code that has been modified by myself (a non-academic staff member) specifically for the university.
Like • Dislike •