UPDATED NTEU advice to academic members concerning the career conversations and reprofiling.
Advice to academic staff for reprofiling conversations
The NTEU response to the UTAS push to improve performance. It is based on member feedback and designed to dovetail with and build on the Academic Workload Guidelines which were derived from the ...
This document is a copy of the response to "The UTAS academic". Based on feedback from members, It offers a critique of the UTAS document and a solution that would lead to higher research performance and would build on the the minimum research expectation
Feedback to UTAS questionnaire on the SETL process
Below is the NTEU response to 'Opening UTAS to Talent :The UTAS Academic'
I sincerely thank all NTEU members who contributed to this paper, sent comments and talked/corresponded with me about their ...
The NTEU were invited at short notice on Tuesday this week by Senior Management representatives to attend a meeting to discuss the “Blueprint” proposal, which was subsequently ...
I encourage all members to seek advice on the newly negotiated guidelines. The AWDC have worked tirelessly in 2011/2012 to reach agreement with UTAS and develop the below.
Please read these and come ...
Flowing from the Academic Staff Agreement 2010-2012, you may be aware that the AWDC has been negotiating research activity guidelines since November. I am happy to report these have been agreed and ...
After the last AWDC meeting on November 1, the AWDC drafted the following documents for further discussion. Attached are the draft Teaching Guidelines as well as a suggested workload modelling sheet.
...NTEU members are invited to make comment on this draft submission in regards to UTAS strategy. Comments can be posted on the site or directed personally via email to John.Kenny@utas.edu.au